<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feeling like I needed you</title>
	<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/</link>
	<description>Resonator -- we know things.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: MAtt</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-782</link>
		<author>MAtt</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha ha!  So true Paul.  The record industry's doomed!  They're living about 20 years in the past.
Fuck EMI.  Didn't think anyone bothered to READ music blogs except me anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha ha!  So true Paul.  The record industry&#8217;s doomed!  They&#8217;re living about 20 years in the past.<br />
Fuck EMI.  Didn&#8217;t think anyone bothered to READ music blogs except me anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch: Goldfrapp - &#8220;A&#38;E&#8221; + more &#171; Consequence of Sound</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-748</link>
		<author>Watch: Goldfrapp - &#8220;A&#38;E&#8221; + more &#171; Consequence of Sound</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-748</guid>
		<description>[...] Tree sure has been kept under pretty tight wraps. From legals notices pertaining to mp3 postings to the inability to embed &#8220;A&#38;E&#8221; via youtube,&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Tree sure has been kept under pretty tight wraps. From legals notices pertaining to mp3 postings to the inability to embed &#8220;A&amp;E&#8221; via youtube,&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldfrapp has plans in 2008 &#171; Consequence of Sound</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-740</link>
		<author>Goldfrapp has plans in 2008 &#171; Consequence of Sound</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-740</guid>
		<description>[...] A remix is legal, right? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A remix is legal, right? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Possible last misstep at Resonator Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-724</link>
		<author>Possible last misstep at Resonator Magazine</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a secret that, roundabout these parts, the RIAA is a little less than loved-up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a secret that, roundabout these parts, the RIAA is a little less than loved-up. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-670</link>
		<author>Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-670</guid>
		<description>EMI is just pissed they're all going to lose their job in a few years because they're no longer relevant. Fuck em to hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMI is just pissed they&#8217;re all going to lose their job in a few years because they&#8217;re no longer relevant. Fuck em to hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaun bateman</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-665</link>
		<author>shaun bateman</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>ryan:

honestly, i'm relatively unconcerned with the fact that i now have an (admittedly) awful, prose-heavy fact-free post up about how fucking beautiful i think this album is. after all, goldfrapp has a "blog team" that will probably reach those important blogs that have given goldfrapp good press! you know, like...
...
...
...

...

well, i mean, they threatened to take us to court. so whatever. allison goldfrapp can buy me a martini or whatever. i'm SURE it was a mistake, that by "court" they meant "food court" and by "suit" they meant "three-piece suit purchased in your size, shaun, as a repayment for being the only god damn person out there to give a fuck every time allison goldfrapp takes a crap or gets a remix".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ryan:</p>
<p>honestly, i&#8217;m relatively unconcerned with the fact that i now have an (admittedly) awful, prose-heavy fact-free post up about how fucking beautiful i think this album is. after all, goldfrapp has a &#8220;blog team&#8221; that will probably reach those important blogs that have given goldfrapp good press! you know, like&#8230;<br />
&#8230;<br />
&#8230;<br />
&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>well, i mean, they threatened to take us to court. so whatever. allison goldfrapp can buy me a martini or whatever. i&#8217;m SURE it was a mistake, that by &#8220;court&#8221; they meant &#8220;food court&#8221; and by &#8220;suit&#8221; they meant &#8220;three-piece suit purchased in your size, shaun, as a repayment for being the only god damn person out there to give a fuck every time allison goldfrapp takes a crap or gets a remix&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trixie</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-664</link>
		<author>trixie</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>you know, ryan, they didn't. and we will never again in the new year make the mistake of giving EMI publicity, don't worry. 

*foreshadowing* ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, ryan, they didn&#8217;t. and we will never again in the new year make the mistake of giving EMI publicity, don&#8217;t worry. </p>
<p>*foreshadowing* ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-663</link>
		<author>Ryan</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-663</guid>
		<description>EMI asked you to remove the track&#62;? Did they pay you for the free advertising?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMI asked you to remove the track&gt;? Did they pay you for the free advertising?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaun bateman</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-662</link>
		<author>shaun bateman</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>love you both! mwah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love you both! mwah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oia</title>
		<link>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-661</link>
		<author>Oia</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.resonatormag.com/2007/11/30/but-there-may-be-pills-at-work/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>The song must be removed at once or you will risk court action.  

Also, please keep an eye out on your syntax/punctuation/sentence structure - very difficult to read, and littered with errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The song must be removed at once or you will risk court action.  </p>
<p>Also, please keep an eye out on your syntax/punctuation/sentence structure - very difficult to read, and littered with errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
